Laura Trahan

Why the Press is Treating Vice President Dick Cheney Unfairly



Posted: Monday, February 20, 2006

by Laura Trahan

Once again, I find myself shaking my head in disbelief as I watch as journalists go overboard sensationalizing an event. The media tend to never back down when it comes to judging someone else’s mistakes. Vice President Dick Cheney finds himself right smack in the middle of their latest conquest.

I used to work as a news reporter covering local city government. What I hated most, besides the endless hours, is that for a story to be real news, it always seemed that someone’s name or reputation was being destroyed. Yes, I said it.

As a member of the media, and someone who considers herself a journalist, I admit there is a fine line between objectivity and bias. Even when you are telling the truth it always seemed someone would look bad. At first I had fantasies of being the next Woodward, searching for truth and justice, but I learned quickly that it is all about making the editor, publisher, professor, advertisers or readers happy.

While studying journalism in college in liberal Arkansas, I learned quickly the more pro President Bill Clinton a story was the higher the A. In Texas, I learned the more conservative a story was, the more reader response I received.

Now I am in awe as the media tear Cheney apart because of a recent hunting accident. It isn’t the accident per se or the fact that he shot a companion accidentally that they are mad about, but that they were not informed. I have compiled a few reasons why they are simply absurd to keep reporting this.

It is their jobs

When did journalism cease to be about investigating and researching stories? Why would a reporter have the audacity to expect people to come to the newspaper or television station and provide them with the news? Part of being a reporter is going out and finding the news. That is why reporters have beats to be on constant look out for news. It is sad that they expect the Vice President to just do their job for them.

It is not news

Maybe if it was, Vice President Cheney would have felt compelled to inform the press. Hunting accidents happen every day. In fact, while looking at statistics, this type of accident is more prevalent than other types of hunting accidents. This type of event would never have been reported if it happened to anyone else, why expect the Vice President to know that it would have been news. If the press is having to get former opposite party presidents to come out and criticize the administration on its handling of the situation, they are stretching to make it news.

It wasn’t a conspiracy

The main complaint has been that Cheney did not immediately inform the press. The Vice President does not travel with the press like the President does. I think he had more on his mind besides running to the nearest pay phone to report to the press. He wanted to get his friend medical attention as well as let the ranch owner prepare for the mass chaos of media that would swarm her family ranch. I also think that his scheduling is such that as soon as he saw his friend was going to be fine, he needed to get back to his job.

It does not make sense

The press seems to be the only group upset by this. It would be different if the guy who was shot pressed charges or publicly reported his disgust. But the man actually apologized for the “embarrassment" he caused the Vice President. Or it would have been news if anti-hunting groups threw blood on him and called him a “killer." No conflict took place except between the press and the vice president.

So that brings us back to the beginning. Who does the press think they are that they can make up news that really isn’t news? They get their feelings hurt because a little local paper gets the story because Cheney wouldn’t do their job for them? Does this story make sense at all?

Laura Trahan is married to an awesome, amazing, wonderful, etc. etc. man and has two beautiful kids. She has just recently woke up and started two new blogs http://lauratrahan.wordpress.com and http://tomballgtmom.wordpress.com. Feel free to visit anytime.
This Article has been viewed 1,774 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (7 total)
» left by Anonymous 6 years 79 days ago.
Cheney did not shoot his friend with Buck-shot, it was Bird-shot. Buck-shot would shred a little quail to pieces. With this said, Bird-shot hitting a well dressed hunter from sixty yards away, would not have done much damage. What's the real story?
» left by Raoul Duke from Belmar, NJ 6 years 77 days ago.
Too bad Cheney was unwilling to use his markmanship skills during Vietnam, which he managed to avoid. Also, hunting accidents are treated like traffic accidents in that the cops always do a sobriety check, maybe the reason for the reporting delay?
» left by Dr. Mike Copper
from Florida
6 years 77 days ago.
I would rather hunt with Dick Cheney than go for an auto ride with Ted Kennedy.
» left by Anonymous from White House 6 years 76 days ago.
What makes it newsworthy is he is the VP. Since Cheney is next in line after Bush what matters is his actions, how he handles things, his decision making, his judgement, his ethics and his honesty. There is reason he has such low poll ratings.
» left by Kelly from Canada 6 years 73 days ago.
I'm not sure how the media has treated this story, as I boycott all American propoganda, but here in Canada, we find it quite appropriate. Only in America does the VP shoot someone and get away with it, but that's the American way, kill kill kill!
» left by someone who thinks from not in texas 6 years 24 days ago.
This woman is delusional.
» left by Sarah Williamson
from north carolina
5 years 357 days ago.
Thank God someone has some sense. The liberal media has gone nuts.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.